MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small (18-25 nucleotides),
non-coding, single-stranded RNA molecules found in plants, animals, and
viruses. These molecules play a role in RNA silencing and post-transcriptional
regulation of gene expression and, therefore, can be used as a biomarker for body
fluid identifications (BFID). While messenger RNA (mRNA) and miRNA demonstrate
tissue-specific expression, miRNAs are more stable in compromised samples due
to their small size and highly abundant per cell. For these reasons, forensic
scientists have looked into these biomolecules for determining the DNA source
recovered from casework evidence. Forensic DNA analysis is often performed on
many types of substrates such as saliva, semen, venous blood, menstrual blood,
tissues, teeth and bone, etc. In some cases, it would be beneficial to know
whether the DNA came from a sperm cell versus an epithelial cell, for example.
Traditionally, this was done by cutting a vaginal swab in half and smearing one
half on a slide to visualize if sperm was present under a microscope. The other
half would go onto DNA analysis. This is not ideal because the foreign male DNA
could be present in low amounts and half of the material has now been consumed.
Therefore, one study looked at co-extraction and co-analysis of DNA and miRNA
to obtain an STR profile (for human identification, HID) and determine the origin
of that DNA (BFID). They specifically looked at 4 miRNA markers for menstrual
blood, venous blood, and semen in a multiplex reaction. Then they amplified the
co-extracted DNA with a commercial STR kit. Both amplified products from DNA
and miRNA were separated and detected on the same capillary electrophoresis
(CE) platform. They were successfully able to determine the source of DNA and
the origin of where it came from. Likewise, another study looked at 8 miRNA
markers for blood, saliva, semen, and vaginal material using quantitative PCR
(qPCR) compared to CE. The results of the study showed that blood and semen
were highly distinguishable from the other fluids, but saliva and vaginal fluid
have many markers in common. In addition, the CE analysis was able to detect
absence or presence of miRNAs like qPCR; however, CE analysis also offers an
indication of expression level. In conclusion these studies show the
possibility for confirmed BFID with co-analysis of DNA with the potential for
an extended panel of markers.
References:
1)
Li Y, Zhang J, Wei W, Wang Z, Prinz M, Hou Y. A
strategy for co-analysis of microRNAs and DNA. FSI:Genetics 12 (2014) 24-29.
2)
van der Meer D J, Williams G A. Performing body fluid
identification with microRNAs using capillary electrophoresis. FSI: Genetics
Supplement Series 5 (2015) e592-e594.
I am all for any method that helps make identifying DNA samples easier. It is interesting that the different methods allow for different things to be determined, and what possible combination of these methods may be used in the future.
ReplyDeleteThis is pretty neat. Is it possible that something like this could be used in cold cases? And does this process take longer than normal testing? If something like this could be used for rape kits, then it's possible it could help with the huge backlog (or make it worse, depending on how long it takes).
ReplyDeleteGood questions, Heather.
ReplyDelete