DNA degradation is a
major concern for forensic evidence and human identification. Analysis of DNA
in the forensic community utilizes short tandem repeats (STRs) that range from
100 to 500 base pairs (bp) in size. The more extensive the degradation, the
smaller the fragments of DNA, and the less likelihood to obtain a full profile
for identification due to drop-out of the larger loci. I've been wanting to try
this pre-PCR enhancement method that increases DNA typing success for low
template DNA and I'm curious about its application for degraded samples. If
degradation is observed via drop-out of larger loci or a ski-slope effect, the
sample usually gets re-amplified with additional PCR cycles. However, this can
lead to stochastic effects.
The method I'd like to
try, linear amplification, increases starting
template DNA by producing a single copy of the template for every cycle number
as opposed to exponential amplification. This occurs in separate forward and reverse
primer reactions that are then pooled together for downstream analysis. The
thinking behind this was that the linear (and non-exponential) fashion of
amplification would be more representative of the DNA in a sample without the
stochastic effects of low template DNA. However, if a degraded samples can be
amplified with specifically the larger loci in mind then perhaps we could see
more balanced peaks and additional true alleles getting called. The drawback to
this is that you would have to get permission to use commercial kit's
proprietary primers and it would be difficult to customize a linear
amplification multiplex specific to a sample's observed locus drop-out. In
addition, most scientists prefer first pass success for increased productivity
and lower costs.
References:
Grisedale, K., et al. Linear amplification of target prior to PCR for improved
low template DNA results. Biotechniques 56(3) (2014) 145-7.
Although cost issues and commercial use are a problem here, I think this is a brilliant idea. It would seem to me that this technique would yield better accuracy in representing DNA. I would imagine, as time passes, a derivative of this method will be found that is equally accurate and less costly. Maybe you'll be the one who finds it!
ReplyDeleteI keep saying this, but I need to train with you guys.
ReplyDeletewhy larger loci getting shorter then smaller one?
ReplyDelete